THE ORGANIZATION Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

THE ORGANIZATION - Coursework ExampleIn this case study, the father son duo have diametrically opposite lead personal manners, wherein the father prick gestates in an extremely friendly business environment marked by Participative leadership, the son Joseph is seen to portray the ordinary character of an Autocratic leader. It is stated that Peter is a man of charisma and has a dynamic constitution some scholars like Rowe and Guerrero argue that charisma is a necessary condition for leadership (Rowe and Guerrero, 2011, 260). A attractive leader can ensure that the workforce will follow in his footsteps, and consider him to be right, rather of doubting in the efficaciousness of the leader. With much(prenominal) personality traits Peter could have chosen to be an unequivocal leader who leads from the front and gives orders, such that they would be followed since the staff believes in him and is devoted and Peter trusts them. However, he chose to be a democratic leader or in o ther words, a participative leader (Appel and Schmid, 2003, 22). The name itself suggests that the characteristics of such a leader do not revolve around strictness and authoritative rule, but allows for exp unitaryntiation and a democratic way of decision making. On the other polar side is the leadership style sufficient by the bright but not brilliant Joseph. He is categorized as having adapted the authoritative or autocratic leadership style which is recognized as being a one man show, since the leader does not allow for participation in decision making, delegation of duties is not carried reveal, there is lack of trust of the leader in the staff and vice versa, thus the opposite of democratic leadership. leaders is cited as one of the crucial reasons behind the decision of coachial staff to leave a undertaking (Hogan, 2007, 38), thus the fact that under Peters leadership almost all employees have been maintained by the organization for at least 10 years is a substantial p roof of his effective leadership, and that he is welcomed by his staff. When this factor is considered for Josephs leadership, it was observed that the employees were not happy, which can be figured out from the statement by Mr. Spike who told Joseph that he just couldnt work in this climate, therefrom showing that employee turnover would be high as even the most loyal and senior manager wants to quit the job under Josephs leadership. Furthermore, Peter does not practice a laissez-faire leadership style or a rigid leadership style, since his delegation of duty and decision making is match with regular inspections of the efficiency and quality of work and the organization on the whole. He believes in motivation by dint of praise, and thus has made it a regular practice to praise good work, and simultaneously pointing out flaws and inefficiency in any work done by the staff, but since he is so accommodating and open to his staff, it automatically leads to a welcoming response and the staff does not mind if he points out flaws, but on the contrary regards his comments as constructive criticism. While, on the other side, autocratic leaders such as Joseph, believe in meeting rigid targets, and do not allow for any suggestions, it is their personal style of motivation, save apart from the positive aspect of speeding up the process, it